The situation in Australia is further complicated by the climate change politics at play. It may not have caused the fires, but climate change isn't only in the minds of "raving inner-city lefties" either.
Is addiction a useful framework for explaining inaction regarding global heating? Or does it simply excuse bad behavior?
Is our duty to combat global heating grounded in responsibility, justice, or humanitarian concern? Why might this distinction matter?
The language we use to describe the state of our world has significant influence in motivating human action.
Urban exploration can change our connection to the world and the way we see ourselves in it. But it can also reinforce a sense of entitlement and separation.
Is the annihilation of a species a justified response to the threat Mosquitoes pose? What about genetic modification? Who gets to decide?
Continued political inactivity to confront the growing climate crisis may mean that participation in demonstration is not simply permissible, but may be morally obligatory.
The memeification of climate change protest shows us once again how comedy and tragedy are related. But there may be consequences to fighting the ongoing climate emergency with humor in a transitory medium.
Environmental ethics butts up against religious convictions: should climate change realities alter our beliefs about how to honor the dead?
The conflict regarding the Djap Wurrung trees in western Victoria presents an opportunity to redress longstanding injustice.