Does the unique position of medical professionals make them the best commentators or the worst?
What blame do we bear for enjoying the ill-gotten gains secured by our government?
How can we even begin to chart the contours of such a nebulous thing?
Is the principled refusal to come to the negotiating table with terrorists a morally justified stance?
How do we distinguish between healthy epistemic habits and virtues and those which are unhealthy?
Is there any justifying the state's strong-arming and bullying in the name of its citizens' public health?
On what grounds could we possibly object to the geopolitical opportunism that represents business as usual?
A not insignificant portion of the unvaccinated continue to confound us in their refusal to acknowledge the basic demands of fairness.
It's difficult to see the narrative that this political showdown was about taking a stand on principles as anything but hollow.
Are we justified in constraining some people's rights so that others might enjoy a return to normal?